Example case studies — anonymized, based on Actigence client engagements

When the consultants left, the system stayed.

Three transformations. Three plants. Three teams that kept running their daily operation on the same platform — long after the program closed and the slide decks went into a drawer.

-62%TIER huddle time
-74%Overdue actions
-94%Audit prep window
+28ppLSW adherence
Tier-1 European pharma manufacturer

From a dead SQCDP wall to a TIER cadence that survived two consultant exits.

Sterile fill-finish, multi-product, four lines, EU GMP + FDA

01The dead board

Walk into the corridor outside Line 3 in February. The SQCDP whiteboard hangs there, dusty. Last update: a deviation note from October, a faded green dot on Quality, and a Post-it that says "Marc to follow up" — Marc moved teams in November. The morning huddle still happens, technically, but it is six people staring at their phones for nine minutes.

02The mode shift

The OpEx program brought in ProBeya in program mode: diagnostic boards across the four lines, A3 problem-solving on the top three deviation drivers, kaizen funnel for operators, TIER 1-2-3 cadence locked at 7:30 / 9:00 / 11:00. Within six weeks the huddle stopped being optional. Within twelve, the plant director was reading the TIER 3 board on his phone in the car park before he came in.

03The handover that didn't kill it

The consultants packed up at month 14. Nothing migrated, nothing was archived. The 7:30 huddle ran the next morning on the same screen with the same board. Six months later: TIER 1 still daily, TIER 2 still daily, TIER 3 still weekly, deviations still captured from the shopfloor in under a minute, audit prep window collapsed from two weeks to a continuous posture. The system kept running because there was nothing to hand over.

04The numbers

Operational metrics, plant-recorded, 18 months post-handover:

  • TIER huddle time -62% (24 min → 9 min)
  • OEE +6.4 percentage points
  • Deviation closure cycle -11 days median
  • Audit findings -71% (last MHRA inspection)
  • LSW adherence +28 percentage points

I budgeted for the consultants. I did not budget for a tool that would still be running my morning huddle two years later. That is the only line in the closing report I actually defend at board.

Plant director, Tier-1 European pharma manufacturer
Specialty CDMO

When the program ended, the daily ops did not have to start over.

Three sites, biotech and small-molecule, fast-growing client portfolio

01The dead board

Three sites, three different SharePoints, three different ways of running the morning meeting. The shared spreadsheet that was supposed to roll up cross-site OEE last opened by anyone in March. The OpEx director called it "the most expensive screensaver in the company." Tech transfer between sites took an average of eleven weeks because no two sites used the same definitions.

02The mode shift

ProBeya rolled out in program mode as the unifying obeya across the three sites: shared SQCDP nomenclature, shared TIER cadence, shared problem-solving rituals, shared action ownership rules. The consultants ran cross-site kaizen events, established a TIER 4 weekly cross-site read-out, and pinned every action to a named owner with an SLA. The shared spreadsheet was retired in week eight.

03The handover that didn't kill it

End of program, end of consultant time, no migration project. The Tuesday TIER 4 cross-site call kept running on the same dashboard. Site leads kept owning their TIER 2. Operators kept submitting kaizen ideas from a tablet on the line. New tech transfers started using the platform from day one as the operating system, not as a project artifact. The handover was a calendar invite, not a workstream.

04The numbers

Cross-site operational metrics, 12 months post-handover:

  • MTTR (deviation) -38%
  • Tech transfer cycle -54 days median
  • Cross-site visibility 100% (was ~30%)
  • Overdue actions -74%
  • Kaizen idea throughput ×3.2

The consultants gave us a method. ProBeya gave us the muscle memory. The method walked out the door with them. The muscle memory stayed in the building.

OpEx director, specialty CDMO
Generics filler-line operation

The audit prep window collapsed because the daily ops never stopped being audit-ready.

Single-site, high-volume oral-solids, regulated GMP environment, audit-heavy quarter

01The dead board

Audit week was a fire drill. Quality team pulled all-nighters reconstructing batch deviation timelines from emails, paper logs and three different change-control systems. The TIER board on the floor was a printed PDF that got reprinted on Mondays — sometimes. The plant director called audit season "the eight weeks a year I do not run a plant, I run a paperwork project."

02The mode shift

ProBeya came in for the OpEx program with one explicit charter: every action, every deviation, every CAPA, every leader standard work check is captured live, signed under 21 CFR Part 11, time-stamped, owner-named. The program rituals were rebuilt around audit-readiness as a daily side-effect, not a quarterly campaign. By month four, the deviation pack was generated in two clicks instead of two weeks.

03The handover that didn't kill it

Consultants left at month 11. The next FDA audit hit at month 13. There was no prep window. The daily ops had been running audit-ready for two months without anyone treating it as audit prep. The auditor walked the floor with the inspector portal open on a tablet. The Quality lead spent the morning explaining the TIER cascade, not reconstructing it. The system that ran the program ran the audit.

04The numbers

Audit-cycle and operational metrics, two audit cycles post-handover:

  • Audit prep window -94% (8 weeks → 3 days)
  • Audit findings -82% across two cycles
  • Deviation closure cycle -17 days median
  • First-time-right batch release +9 percentage points
  • OEE +4.8 percentage points sustained

I used to lose a quarter a year to audit prep. Now I lose a long weekend. That is not a software upgrade. That is my plant back.

Plant director, generics filler-line operation

Want to see what survives in your plant?

Open the demo workspace with pre-loaded TIER, SQCDP, deviation and kaizen data — or talk to us about what your transformation budget looks like in dual-mode.